Skip to content

Add logging to InfoController's Get method for better traceability #3

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 4, 2025

Conversation

LiteObject
Copy link
Owner

@LiteObject LiteObject commented Apr 4, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Improved internal monitoring without altering the user-facing response. The endpoint continues to deliver the established "Hello World" message.
    • Disabled the check for the size of the generated diff in the GitHub Actions workflow.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 4, 2025

Walkthrough

This change adds a logging statement to the Get method of the InfoController, which logs an informational message when the method is invoked. The functionality of the method remains unchanged, continuing to return an "Ok" response with the string "Hello World". Additionally, a section of the GitHub Actions workflow that checked the size of the generated diff has been commented out, disabling this functionality. No modifications were made to the declarations of public or exported entities.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
src/MyWebApi/.../Controllers/WeatherForecastController.cs Added a logging call in the Get method of the controller that logs an informational message.
.github/workflows/code-review.yml Commented out the "Check Diff Size" job in the GitHub Actions workflow, disabling the size check functionality.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    actor Client
    participant InfoController
    participant Logger
    Client->>InfoController: GET request
    InfoController->>Logger: Log "Hello World from InfoController!"
    InfoController->>Client: Return Ok "Hello World"
Loading

Poem

I'm a bunny with a skip and a log so bright,
Hopping through code on a starry night.
A quick "Hello World" in the log I left,
Bringing cheer without a misstep.
Code carrots and hops in digital light!


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/code-review.yml (1)

42-51: Clarify the Commented-Out Diff Size Check Block
The "Check Diff Size" step has been entirely commented out. Please ensure that this decision is intentional and documented—whether it is a temporary workaround or a permanent removal. Adding a TODO or an inline comment with the rationale would help maintain clarity for future maintainers.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fd783b9 and 05630c5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/code-review.yml (1 hunks)

@LiteObject LiteObject merged commit e410d20 into main Apr 4, 2025
1 check failed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant